One reason why we did not observe any correlation between the 18F

One reason why we did not observe any correlation between the Selleckchem BV-6 18F-FDG uptake and the TP53 and CCND1 status could be that the tumour cells in vitro have an excess of nutrients, and that they must be placed under stress to reveal a correlation. Therefore, the next experimental step will be to treat the cell lines with cisplatin, perhaps providing more insight into the complex and still enigmatic mechanisms behind the intracellular uptake and accumulation

of 18F-FDG. The six cell lines were also tested regarding cisplatin sensitivity. Cisplatin-induced cell death was measured using crystal violet staining, a method evaluated before [9]. A statistical difference was found between the cell lines, demonstrating the usefulness of the model for studying chemosensitivity. Conclusion The results in this present study support selleck the value of tumour cell cultures as a model for prognostic and predictive studies. We found the successful establishment of an in vitro cell line from a tumour to be an independent negative prognostic marker.

Furthermore, we found it feasible to study metabolic activity with 18F-FDG uptake, and other tumour biologic characteristics, including the chemosensitivity of the cell lines. Despite the relatively small number of tumour lines, we found a statistically significant correlation between a shorter tumour selleckchem doubling time and higher 18F-FDG uptake. However, no significant difference was seen between 18F-FDG uptake and other proliferation parameters, including TP53 and CCND1 status. Although, the complex metabolic interactions between host and tumour, which create the microenvironment in vivo, will not be reproducible in cultured cell lines the growing knowledge of tumour cell characteristics will provide more understanding of the clinical behaviour of HNSCC tumours and of prognosis and therapy results for HNSCC patients. Acknowledgements The authors

want to thank Christina Boll and Margareta Ohlsson for valuable assistance with the experimental work. This study was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society (grant no. CAN 2007/1092), the King Gustaf V Jubilee Fund (grant mafosfamide no. 074242), governmental funding of clinical research within the Swedish health care system, the Foundations of the Lund University Hospital, Gunnar Nilsson’s Cancer Foundation (grant no. W121/07), Fru Berta Kamprad’s Foundation for Utforskning och Bekämpning av Cancersjukdomar, and Laryngfonden (grant no. 13-07). The experiments were performed according to current Swedish legislation, and were approved by the Regional Ethics Board of Southern Sweden (LU376-01, M48-06). References 1. Ferley JAM, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P: Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006.

Comments are closed.