Loffroy et al. summarised outcomes in ten case series of 75 patients
treated EX 527 with embolization. The rate of clinical success, rebleeding, and mortality rate was 75%, 25%, and 25%, respectively . In retrospectives comparisons of angiographic embolization versus surgery, in patients with PUB who do not respond to endoscopic NVP-BGJ398 mouse haemostatic attempts, angiographic embolization was associated with reduced treatment-related complications (20–54% vs. 37–68%). Mortality after either treatment was similar (3–30% vs. 14–30%) [131–133]. A randomised controlled trial compared surgery with further endoscopic treatment for rebleeding. In 75% of these patients, further endoscopic treatment led to durable haemostasis. Patients randomly allocated
to surgery ACY-1215 concentration had substantially more postoperative complications. However, a sub-group analysis suggested that ulcers larger than 2 cm and a major rebleeding with hypotension were factors that predicted failure in further endoscopic attempts; thus, in these patients, surgery or angiographic embolization should be immediately available if repeated endoscopic treatment fails . A recent study suggests transcatheter superselective angioembolization, with reembolization if necessary, is an effective rescue treatment modality for hemodynamically unstable patients with active gastrointestinal hemorrhage and is a reasonable management option. all Twenty percent of patients will fail superselective angioembolization and require additional intervention. Ischemic complications are extremely rare . For patients with intractable ulcer bleeding, Schroeder et al. from the analysis of large database (ACS-NSQIP) have found that the surgical procedure of vagotomy/drainage is associated with significantly lower mortality than just with simple local ulcer oversew. They futher suggest that vagotomy/drainage is preferred to local procedures alone for the surgical management of patients with bleeding peptic ulcer disease requiring emergency operation for intractable bleeding ulcers . Open surgery is recommended when endoscopic treatments failed and there is evidence of ongoing bleeding +/−
hemodynamic instability. The surgeon may not know preoperatively where the bleeding comes from and intraoperative endoscopic guidance may be helpful. A retractor that elevates the sternum might be needed (the so called Goligher sternal-lifting retractor) and sometimes is necessary to excise the xiphisterum. Then, after defusing the spleen, the oesophagus should be taped to enable control of stomach. In case of bleeding gastric ulcer (GUs), anterior gastrotomy can be easily performed. In case of bleeding duodenal ulcer (DUs) it might be needed to perform a duodenotomy and open across D1 and pylorus, longitudinally. Bleeding GUs should be resected (even just a local resection) or at least biopsied for the possibility of neoplasms.