In the scope of the “German adaptation strategy” there was an increased request regarding regional climate change scenarios. Regional climate scenarios are available from a number of research groups (e.g., Déqué et al., 2005). Running such scenarios is no longer

a challenge, and is done routinely. For many stakeholders and for the public, adequate interpretation of scenarios is crucial. STA-9090 mouse To develop tools, which meet these stakeholder needs, the North German Climate Office4 has been set up. The office has developed a number of information products: A fact sheet on the use of regional climate scenarios documents the most frequent misunderstandings by using scenarios (Meinke et al., 2011). Emphasis has been placed on the significance of ranges due to different emission scenarios and different models used. Consistent with this fact sheet an interactive climate web atlas has been developed where twelve atmospheric regional scenarios were analyzed for Northern Germany and sub-regions (Meinke and Gerstner, 2009). For different time horizons, ranges of possible Veliparib in vivo future climate

changes in Northern Germany are visualized by maps together with short interpretations. Another product, developed together with the German Weather Service, illuminates to what extent recent atmospheric changes in Northern Germany are consistent with the perspectives envisaged by the scenarios (Meinke et al., 2014). For coastal regions, obviously the possibly changing impact of rising storm water levels is of great concern. A future

change in the storm surge risk demands adaptation in terms of coastal defense, spatial planning and logistics. Two major factors in such scenarios are the rise in mean sea Meloxicam level and the change in storm related short term accumulation of coastal water. The first factor is a contested issue, because there is much uncertainty in the question, how much less, or more, water is stored on the big ice sheets Antarctica and Greenland (cf., Katsman et al., 2011). New satellite-born measurements of the ice sheets, as well as continued monitoring of the mean sea level will help to reduce the uncertainty in the coming years and decades, but for the time being, it may be best to simply accept a large uncertainty about the perspectives. An analysis determined that largest possible values of sea level rise at the end of the 21st century could be 1.2 m, or so. The second factor, related to storms, can be much better described, at least with respect to extra-tropical storms, which are well described in atmospheric climate change scenarios. The usual approach employed nowadays is to dynamically downscale atmospheric scenarios of possible climate change, and then feed the changing winds and air pressures into a hydrodynamic model of, for instance, the North Sea (e.g., Gaslikova et al., 2012 and Woth, 2005). Local features such as estuaries or barrier islands are not routinely resolved, and some statistical “location” methods may be used (Grossmann et al., 2007).