HPV16 and 18 are responsible for about 90% of the Copanlisib cell line HPV-positive anal, vulvar/vaginal and oropharyngeal cancers [90], although the estimates are less reliable for cancers other than cervix because the number of high quality HPV typing observations is much lower. It seems likely that routine HPV typing of all cases of HPV-associated cancer forms will become an essential part of the long-term evaluation/monitoring of HPV vaccination programmes

in most countries. Current HPV vaccines include only the major oncogenic types, responsible for only 70% of cervical cancers. Moreover, as the vaccines are aimed at protecting HPV-naive individuals, and the effect on already exposed women is questionable, screening will continue to be necessary [91]. Nevertheless, the reduced background risk may, after just a few decades, allow an increase of the screening intervals. It has been estimated that conventional cytological screening every 5 years starting at 30 years of age results in a 67% reduction in lifetime cervical cancer risk. Adding HPV16/18 vaccination to this programme would result in a risk reduction of 89% [92]. Obviously, several aspects

of monitoring and evaluation are the same or strongly interrelated for screening and vaccination, arguing that these complementary strategies need to be co-ordinated in a comprehensive cervical learn more cancer prevention programme [91,93,94]. Internationally comparable methods for monitoring of HPV vaccination programmes.  The global HPV LabNet has been launched by the WHO as an initiative towards global quality assurance and standardization of HPV testing methods used in follow-up of HPV vaccination programmes (http://www.who.int/biologicals/vaccines/hpv/en/index.html). International collaborative

studies have been performed for both HPV serology [95] and HPV DNA testing and typing [96]. The results indicate that methods clonidine are comparatively robust, provided that measurements are related to the same international standard serum that is assayed in parallel [95]. For both HPV antibodies and HPV DNA tests, WHO reference reagent of anti-HPV 16 antibody and the first WHO international standards for HPV types 16 and 18 DNA are available from the WHO International Laboratory for Biological Standards in the UK (http://www.nibsc.ac.uk/products.aspx); other biological reference standards that will facilitate interlaboratory comparison and harmonize laboratory testing via defining an international unit of measurement are being pursued. For quality assurance, and as a basis for certification, global proficiency panels will be made available. An ‘HPV laboratory manual’ that will provide quality assurance/quality control guidance, basic validated assay protocols and examples of state-of-the-art methods is being developed at WHO.