Horizontal lines separate different band patterns Additional inf

Horizontal lines separate different band patterns. Additional information about STs, CCs, phylogroups, ftsI alleles, PBP3 types, PBP3 groups and strain origin is provided. The colour scale (similar to Figure 3) indicates relative frequencies of various alternatives within each of the columns 1–6. eB gr2, eBURST group 2; Mis, miscellaneous; Sg, singletons; Ng, no phylogroup. Statistics Multivariate regression analysis and Fisher’s exact test was find more performed using Predictive Analytics Software (PASW) Statistics version 17.0 (IBM Corporation, US). Ethics The bacterial isolates and patient information used in this study

were collected as part of the Norwegian Surveillance Programme for Antimicrobial Resistance (NORM). The NORM programme is warranted in Norwegian law (http://​lovdata.​no, FOR-2003-11-14-1353) and no further ethical approval was required for the use of isolates and data in this study. Results Resistance genotypes In the R-group (n = 177), 116 isolates (66%) had essential PBP3 substitutions and were categorized as rPBP3. The remaining 61 isolates in the R-group, and all 19 isolates in the S-group, lacked essential substitutions and were categorized as sPBP3 (Table 4). Table 4 Frequencies of beta-lactam resistance and clinical characteristics in study groups and in the original population a     rPBP3c Bla d Proportions (%) of isolates and patients Groups

selleck kinase inhibitor of isolatesb n n % n % Anatomical

sites Age groups Hospitalizede             Eye Ear selleck products respiratory 0-3 ≥50   Resistant group 177 116 66 16 9 28 10 58 44 24 33 Susceptible group 19 0 0 0 0 21 32 42 68 5 11 Remaining isolates 599 0f 0f 60g 10g 19 15 63 41 22 23 Original population 795h 116 15 76 10 21 14 62 43 22 25 aNORM 2007 surveillance population Dehydratase [33], consisting of consecutive routine isolates from patients with eye, ear and respiratory tract infections. bSee text and Figure 1 for definition of the study groups (Resistant group and Susceptible group). cPBP3-mediated resistance (see Table 1). dBeta-lactamase positive. eProportions of patients hospitalized at the time of sampling. fAssuming that all rPBP3 isolates were selected for the Resistant group. gAs reported by the primary laboratories. hThirteen isolates were selected for the Resistant group but excluded for various reasons (see Figure 1). Most rPBP3 isolates were group II (111/116, 96%), including seven TEM-1 positive isolates, but one group III and two group III-like high-rPBP3 isolates were also identified (Table 3). The rPBP3 prevalence in the original population was thus 15% (116/795) and the prevalence of combined rPBP3 and TEM-1 was 0.9% (7/795). Eighteen PBP3 substitution patterns were present in rPBP3 isolates, with PBP3 types A, B and D accounting for 72% (84/116) and PBP3 type A alone accounting for 41% (48/116).

Comments are closed.