44 0.20 0.02 0.05 Lactate, mM 3.40 3.78 3.22 3.49 0.86 0.71 0.87 0.92 NH3-N, mM 0.74 0.73 0.71 1.15 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.76 Ethanol, mM 3.15 3.60 2.72 2.74 0.36 0.38 0.40 0.42 Beet pulp-induced see more propionic subacute acidosis Ruminal pH                 Mean 5.67 5.94 5.87 5.93 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.02 Anlotinib nmr Minimum 5.55 5.84 5.72 5.83 0.11 0.05 0.27 0.06 Total VFAs, mM 114 112 104 100 6.66 0.89 0.33 0.16 Acetate, mol % 67.4 68.6 68.4 67.8 1.15 0.46 0.55 0.79 Propionate, mol % 22.5 21.5 21.9 22.3 0.83 0.38 0.61 0.88 Butyrate, mol % 8.52 8.40 8.18 8.34 0.49 0.86 0.85 0.77

Minor VFAs, mol % 1.50 1.48 1.52 1.46 0.26 0.94 0.96 0.91 Lactate, mM 2.71 2.01 1.52 2.01 1.46 0.73 0.56 0.73 NH3-N, mM 0.55 0.51 0.57 0.57 0.74 0.97 0.99 0.98 Ethanol, mM 3.34 3.22 2.64 2.84 0.48 0.86 0.31 0.47 1 Treatment with C = control without probiotic; P = Propionibacterium P63; Lp + P = L. plantarum + P63; Lr + P = L. rhamnosus + P63. 2 Effect of each

probiotic treatment check details vs. control wether (C). 3 Individual VFAs are expressed in % of total VFAs. 4 Minor VFAs: sum of iso-butyrate, iso-valerate, valerate and caproate. The fermentation characteristics were determined on d3 at 6 h after feed challenges induced acidosis. Figure 1 Effects of bacterial probiotic supplementation on the rumen microbial parameters during wheat-induced lactic acidosis. Acidosis was induced during 3 consecutive days. Protozoa, bacteria and polysaccharidase activities were quantified 3 h after acidosis induction on day 3. Bacterial species are expressed as % of total bacteria per gram of dry matter (DM). Polysaccharidase activities are expressed as μmol of reducing sugar/mg protein/h. The treatments were identified as C = control without probiotic; P = Propionibacterium P63; Lp + P = L. plantarum + P63; Lr + P = L. rhamnosus + P63. Each single point is a mean of 4 data points from the 4-periods Latin square. Error bars represent standard error of the means. Probiotic treatments that significantly differ from control are indicated by * for P ≤ 0.05. According to the fermentation and microbial characteristics, next the negative effects

induced by probiotic supplementation were more marked for P and Lr + P than for Lp + P. A possible explanation for this difference could be that the proportion of S. bovis was higher in wethers treated with P (P < 0.05) and almost reached significance for Lr + P-fed wethers (P = 0.06) as compared with those supplemented with Lp + P (P = 0.9). Thus S. bovis could be considered as a worsening factor rather than an initial cause of the chain of events resulting in lactic acidosis in ruminants [37–39].