, 1994) Rather, CRF is released in the LC by acute stressors to

, 1994). Rather, CRF is released in the LC by acute stressors to shift the mode of activity to a high tonic state. This is evidenced by the ability of local NLG919 microinfusions of CRF antagonists into the LC to prevent LC activation elicited by the acute

stressors, hypotension and colonic distention (Page et al., 1993, Valentino et al., 1991 and Lechner et al., 1997). Central administration of CRF antagonists also prevented LC activation by acute exposure to predator odor, which also shifts the mode of LC discharge to a high tonic state (Curtis et al., 2012). Other endpoints of stress-induced LC activation, such as forebrain NE release and cortical EEG activation are also prevented by intra-LC microinfusion of CRF antagonists (Page et al., 1993 and Kawahara et al., 2000). Together, these studies support a model whereby acute stress engages CRF inputs to the LC to bias activity towards a high tonic state that would favor increased arousal, scanning attention and behavioral flexibility (Fig. 2A). Studies combining retrograde SAHA HDAC cell line tracing from the LC and immunohistochemistry to localize CRF and the immediate early gene, c-fos implicate the central nucleus of the

amygdala and Barrington’s nucleus as sources of CRF that activate the LC during hypotensive stress and colonic distention, respectively and suggest that CRF circuits activating the LC are stressor-specific (Curtis et al., 2002 and Rouzade-Dominguez et al., 2001). Similar functional neuroanatomy approaches may be used to delineate the CRF-related circuitry underlying LC activation by psychogenic stressors that are Sodium butyrate more common in humans. Endogenous opioids have long been implicated in the stress response based on evidence for their release

by stressors and their ability to either attenuate or mimic stress responses depending on the specific opioid receptor that is activated. Several laboratories were involved in the discovery and characterization of the endogenous “morphine-like” peptides and their receptors in the early 1970′s (Goldstein et al., 1979, Hughes et al., 1975, Ling et al., 1976, Bradbury et al., 1976, Meunier et al., 1995 and Pert and Snyder, 1973). Distinct genes were identified that encode for the precursors of the three major endogenous opioid peptide families, preproopiomelanocortin, preproenkephalin and preprodynorphin (Meunier et al., 1995, Comb et al., 1982, Kakidani et al., 1982, Nakanishi et al., 1979, Noda et al., 1982, Nothacker et al., 1996 and Pan et al., 1996). The active peptides cleaved from these precursors, endorphin, enkephalin and dynorphin, produce their effects through actions on μ-, δ and κ- G-protein coupled receptors, respectively (Mogil and Pasternak, 2001 and Pasternak, 2004). Opioids are best recognized for their ability to blunt pain. However, this may be an expression of a broader function to counter stress.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>