We present a discussion of the most relevant recent publications click here on pain rehabilitation in chronic headache disorders. This article describes pain rehabilitation,
reviews outcome data for chronic pain patients treated in this setting, and describes the unique applicability of this treatment approach for patients with chronic headache. Particular attention is directed to the rationale for and the results of the withdrawal, in a pain rehabilitation setting, of opioids and simple analgesics, ergots, and triptans that contribute to medication overuse headaches. Additionally, a case example is reviewed that illustrates the structure and function of a pain rehabilitation program in the treatment of a patient with intractable headache.”
“Epilepsy is the most prevalent disabling neurological disorder across the life span, and is not controlled by medications in
more than one-third of patients. Epilepsy surgery is an accepted treatment, with guidelines supporting utilization in patients with recurrent temporal lobe seizures after two or more trials of antiepileptic medications. Unfortunately, the average delay in presurgical evaluation of appropriate candidates is more than 20 years, and this delay has not improved in recent decades. This offers the international neurological community the opportunity to improve disability, mortality, JQEZ5 molecular weight and quality of life by more effective application of epilepsy surgery and earlier identification of potential candidates. Optimal use of MRI and video/EEG
monitoring should allow cost-effective screening of persons with recurrent seizures prior to more detailed presurgical evaluation when indicated. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.”
“Study Design. A biomechanical study using human cadaveric lumbar spinal motion segments and three different posterior stabilization devices.
Objective. To compare the range of motion, disc height, and foraminal area of a spinal motion segment intact, injured, and fixed with each of three posterior lumbar motion preservation devices.
Summary of Background Data. Motion-sparing check details lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization devices are gaining increasing popularity, particularly for the treatment of degenerative disc disease.
Methods. The PercuDyn, the X-S top, and the Isobar posterior stabilization devices were compared using an in vitro cadaveric model. First, pure moments of +/- 8 Nm were applied in all three planes, then a follower load of 700 N was applied, and finally, sagittal bending tests were repeated. All tests were conducted using an 8-df servohydraulic load frame. Experiments were performed intact, with a simulated injury, and then with each of the three devices for a total of four specimens per device. Foraminal area and disc height (posterolateral and anterior surface) were measured under neutral and peak torques in all three planes and range of motion was recorded for all experimental conditions.
Results.