The prevalence of large LDL ranges did not differ be tween genders or involving socioeconomic lessons. On the other hand, 24. 8% from the participants had borderline values. There was an overall reduced HDL fraction prevalence of 50. 1%. This proportion was higher in ladies than men. No significant differences had been found between the socioeconomic courses concerning the prevalence of reduced HDL. Hypertriglyceridemia was prevalent in approximately ten. 6% of the complete sample, plus the prevalence had been similar amongst genders and amongst the four socioeconomic courses. Energetic smoking was associated by 7. 2% of the sample, with a larger proportion in guys. Prevalence of smoking decreased appreciably from your lowest socioeconomic class to your upper a single. Somewhere around 20. 3% on the sample group were former smokers, and more men had been former smokers than females.
During the sample of 615 participants, 88. 3% showed standard blood glucose amounts, six. 0% had decreased glucose tolerance, three. 3% were diabetics selleckchem below therapy, and two. 4% have been diabetics who were unaware of their status until the time of this evalu ation. As a result, the general prevalence of diabetes mellitus was five. 7%, plus the distribution of diabetes between the genders was comparable. Among the socioeconomic courses, despite the fact that no important tion, with equivalent distribution in each genders. Obesity, nevertheless, was three times extra preva lent in females. A clear increase of prevalence of overweight and weight problems was observed from your lowest to upper socioeconomic courses, wherever 68% showed excessive body fat. The general prevalence of sedentary life-style was 87.
2%, and it had been larger in females than in guys. Persons on the lower socioeconomic class had been more inactive than individuals in the upper socio economic class. The general prevalence of LVH was 20. 0%, and it had been much more prevalent in males than in gals. There was a larger percentage of LVH while in the minimal socioeconomic class than from the upper socioeconomic class. Distribution with the number of cardiovascular order TW-37 chance fac tors is shown in Table 5, with similar values among genders. It really is vital that you note that only 25. 7% of the participants were totally free from modifiable cardiovascular threat aspects and all-around 50% from the sample showed two or far more risk aspects to cardiovascular illness. Figure 1 illustrates the proportion of cardiovascular chance things in accordance to socioeconomic lessons.
We observed the presence of 3 or far more chance elements was greater inside the lower socioeconomic class than during the upper class. Discussion Determination of your prevalence of cardiovascular chance elements in grownups continues to be conducted in various elements from the planet, on the other hand, few studies have been carried out in African populations and also to our information, there are actually no research performed in Angola. On this examine, the prevalence of cardiovascular possibility variables was investigated from the adult population of public sector staff at UAN, and that is the oldest public institution of increased education in Angola.